Dissenting Voices: Quirks and Perks

 

A number of years ago I read a book called How to Read a Book (1940), by Mortimer J. Adler and Charles Van Doren. It’s not some postmodernist meta-referential literature; it’s non-fiction that teaches the art of absorbing letters.

I was mocked for taking it seriously. (After all, what is there to reading?)

I persisted.

The book pointed out some useful techniques, of which one at least has become almost a reflex. I call it book pigeonholing. 

Quote: 

Rule 1. You must know what kind of book you are reading, and you should know this as early in the process as possible, preferably before you begin to read.

Knowing what type of text you’re approaching determines your point of view. For example, reading a short fictional story versus a piece of investigative journalism changes your willingness to suspend disbelief and apply critical thinking.

Pigeonholing a piece of writing is usually done first by source: where did you find it, who wrote it, is it a trustworthy source, is it fiction, etc. Then by title and subtitle: as I’ve discussed these past two weeks in terms of non-fiction, the most successful titles are designed to resonate with the content (as well as “hook” the reader). Next come any prefaces or pictures or graphs or other information.

Ultimately, it’s all to do with expectation. The closer a reader’s initial expectation is to the actual experience, the higher the likelihood they’ll be satisfied. This is why blurbs or advertisements ought to be representative; and why we have the divisions into fiction and non-fiction, into literary and genre, into YA and adult; and why websites tell you the expected reading time of an article or the particular skill set or information you will glean.

So things have changed since 1940.

Modern readers are, if anything, hyper-attuned to categorising texts within a vast, finely-divided loft and then always returning to pick from the same few pigeonholes. Because who wants to spend valuable time perusing far afield only to have their expectations dashed? More specifically, who wants to start reading a book and then have to abandon it halfway through because it’s not “enjoyable”? It’s easier to find a safe, familiar sphere and stay there.

(When this happens to your online information sources—due to personalised search results or recommendations services—it’s called the filter bubble.)

Am I advocating that you become a randomised reading machine, or that you switch to the experimental fiction? No. I’m not even saying anyone should cram unpalatable material down their metaphorical throats for the sake of a “broader horizon”. That’s a bad idea that creates unnecessary indigestion.

However, I do advocate the guiding principle of Quiver Quotes: diverse content sparks diverse thoughts.

Learning to enjoy (your own brand of) variety is a time-consuming process: you have to know in which domain you can stretch yourself, you have to be able to recognise a receptive mood, you have to become competent at kindling curiosity where there is none. It’s a never-ending process that travels within an ever-widening web. One could even put it as: live and learn to read.

But Quiver Quotes isn’t that diverse, you say.

True. To each their own limitations.

Of course, I have a cultural backdrop and a family history.

Of course, I have bounded knowledge.

Of course, I have interests and inclinations that move in cycles with the weather.

I am human, therefore I am biased by my very desire to continue existing. But within any one mind, and under the aegis of that mind’s reining voice, I believe many other disparate—and dissenting—voices can be heard. Should be heard.

Listen.

8 responses

  1. Well, yes… before reading Driving Over Lemons, and hearing it was such an overwhelming success and brilliant read, I’d imagined it was like a Goethe or Oscar Wilde – full of erudite teachings and witticisms (it probably is and I’ve missed them) and fundamental to the understanding of life. But in truth I’m not a very good judge of literary genres and I’d failed to realise that it was just a bloody good read.

    Liked by 1 person

    • You mention Oscar Wilde and witticisms … I just finished rereading The Picture of Dorian Gray (it’s been a while), and I couldn’t believe what I was seeing … Virtually every line from Lord Henry is an antithetical/paradoxical epigram. It got so obvious that the other characters were forced to comment about it for the credibility of the story to be maintained.

      I’m open to something being a bloody good read, and then trying to classify it later. (Read first, think later. 😛 )

      Liked by 2 people

  2. When I first met Sean in flat 4 I asked him what type of books he liked – I was carrying a carton of my own. He said, Oh I haven’t read a book in fifty years. Then later when he came up to my flat for the beer I had offered he looked at my DVDs and I told him to feel free to borrow any. He looked at the spines and said, “Have you any old John Wayne movies?”
    Sean is a very boring man. He doesn’t even like interesting beer.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I’m sure your presence has helped diversify his surroundings. (Although I don’t know what timescale you’re talking about, so if this is a recent anecdote, maybe it’ll take time—diversification is a slow process to begin with but eventually it snowballs.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Great post and one which resonates strongly. It reminds me of The Summer Book by Tove Jansson. My pleasure in this book was stymied because I couldn’t categorise it. It was supposed to be a novel, but was it? Short stories maybe? A series of vignettes? I have no doubt that it is a beautiful work but I was too busy wondering what it was to appreciate it. It’s stayed in my mind for years. One day I’ll read it again – and be better prepared to simply accept it as it is.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I hear you! Sometimes it’s enough, as you say, to know that you won’t be able to categorise what you read, and so relax and stop worrying about it. Wondering about form keeps bringing up the question: did I miss something? which can often ruin the whole experience …

      Thanks for the recommendation and note about The Summer Book. If I ever read it (I put in on my to-read), I’ll know what to expect (or what not to expect, as the case may be). 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  4. What first came to mind as I read this post was ‘Fugitive Pieces’ by Anne Michaels, which did not meet my expectations but in a pleasantly surprising way. I appreciate your recommendation – diverse content, kindling curiosity. Find ways to encroach upon limitation.

    Liked by 1 person

Questions? Comments? Reading recommendations? Let me know.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: